After our adventure into the realm
of strange and post-modern, we can revert into a more comfortable genre: short
stories. For this topic, we’ll tackle something a bit different, the collection
of short stories and essays by Jorge Luis Borges, called Labyrinths This collection is usually analyzed from a post-modern
perspective, as Borges was one of the creators of the genres and leaders in its
criticism. However, the work does have aspects that can have meaning made from
them when the formal method is applied.
It is
important to note that the collection is all made up of short stories. Borges
did not write long fiction in his entire body of work, and there is a purpose
to that choice. The form of the short story affords and implies meaning and
helps along the creative and self-reflexive theme that dominates the work of
Borges.
First,
the short story recalls storytelling, an act innate to human nature. It is as
if Borges were coming up with this story or telling it all to us himself- these
can be read in one sitting. Short story carries on the oral tradition, which is
valued by Borges. Secondly, the brevity of the oral form lends itself to lightness
and playfulness. A light and playful style is paramount to the effect of the
stories- if they are taken too seriously, the true meaning cannot be derived. The
true meaning, in many cases, is a purpose to flaunt the author-reader dialogue
and play with the notion of storytelling itself. The style opposes the rigidity
implied by written language, and introduces a sort of spontaneity. Lastly, the
idea of a narrative economy is supported by the short form of the stories. A
narrative economy is the idea that nothing in the text should be included that
is unnecessary to the development of the narrative. This approach places
narrative first, and the form stresses it.
Borges
choosing to write exclusively in the short story and essay is critical to the
understanding of his work, but also has implications for literature as a whole.
The post-modern movement goes along with the short story, as a more
intellectual, theoretical, and abstract way of thinking. It strives to break the
chains of the tradition of the Ayn Rand-esque tome. It doesn’t take itself so
seriously, but it is absolutely serious in intention. Perhaps, for the future,
we may be seeing a divergence from the novel altogether. Interestingly, this
would be a reversion back to the oral tradition, where a story is only as long
as it can be remembered. We will see how the work of Borges and others has
contributed to the development of text as a whole.
Kefala, Eleni. "Borges and Narrative Economy:
Conservative Formalism or Subversion of Signification?" Variaciones Borges
18 (2004): n. pag. Borges.pitt.edu. Web. 5 June 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment